What's at stake for infrastructure in the Canadian Federal election?

With the Canadian Federal election drawing to a close, this blog explores the promises being made on infrastructure and considers what changes we can expect.

Justin Trudeau, Canada
Justin Trudeau, Canada's current prime minister. Image credit: Shutterstock
  • Updated: 16 September, 2021
  • Author: John Allen, vice president at Global Public Affairs

After a 2019 election that saw Justin Trudeau’s Liberal party form a minority government, the prime minister sent Canadians back to the polls hoping to capitalise on a bounce in the vote from his government’s handling of the Covid pandemic.

Going into the election, a significant poll lead vanished, with pollsters anticipating another minority government led by either the Liberals or Progressive Conservatives.

Infrastructure looms large in the party platforms as way to drive economic growth, unlock housing, meet climate goals, and as a means to support reconciliation with indigenous communities.

The need for infrastructure investment in Canada

Subsequent Conservative and Liberal governments have been ramping up infrastructure spending with $180 billion now committed by the federal government over 12 years from 2016.

The provinces and municipalities, too, have sizeable commitments. Infrastructure investment is seen as a central plank of Canada’s economic recovery.

Reassuringly, the party platforms emphasise the importance of maintaining infrastructure investment. A positive sign that the wider benefits of investing in infrastructure are recognised across party lines and a shift from the days when efforts to balance budgets saw big cuts to infrastructure spending, often with major consequences for the state of repair of public roads, schools, hospitals, and water and sewage systems.

Across political platforms,  there are common themes relating to tackling climate change and transitioning energy systems and transportation, unlocking a greater supply of affordable housing, improving infrastructure for indigenous communities, and investing in transit.

Each party is also looking to leverage procurement to boost local industries with a focus on supporting the decarbonisation of local aluminium, steel, and cement production.

Canada is seeing unprecedented investments in transit with rail projects in almost every major city.

Encouragingly, the other parties have largely committed to the major projects already in planning. There is also alignment on a transition towards electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles with a mixture of policies and investments.

There is also a clear ambition across parties to decarbonise the electricity grid using a variety of levers and approaches available to government. Many provinces already have clean grids powered by hydro dams, nuclear, or other renewables, but some still have coal-burning power plants that are being phased out to help meet Canada’s climate commitments.

Paying for new investment – alternative political approaches

On the financing front, the Canada Infrastructure Bank’s future remains in the balance with both the conservatives and left-leaning NDP [New Democratic Party] pledging to abolish it.

The bank was established by the Liberals following their election in 2015 and had started to gain momentum in the last two years with an increasing number of projects being announced.

The Conservatives pledge to reintroduce the previous approach, built around public-private partnerships and the creation of a Canadian Indigenous Enterprise Corporation to invest in natural resource and infrastructure projects. The NDP proposes the introduction of a climate bank.

Identifying future needs through a Canadian Infrastructure Assessment

It came too late for this election, but in March 2021, Infrastructure Minister Catherine McKenna initiated a National Infrastructure Assessment.

The results of an initial consultation pointed the way to the establishment of a new independent body to advise on long-term planning and prioritisation modelled on similar organisations in Australia and the UK.

The assessment was a significant step towards providing greater certainty around long-term infrastructure planning, given the need to get alignment across federal, provincial and municipal levels of government presenting heightened project risk around election cycles.

The positions of the parties around infrastructure points to a recognition that voters want to see continuity of plans and infrastructure delivered quickly to benefits their daily lives, not a collection of new project ideas and project cancellations.

With infrastructure planning cycles for major projects lasting longer than election cycles, the National Infrastructure Assessment would help to reduce some of the project risk caused by changing political priorities.

The assessment will give a basis of evidence that can better inform parties going into elections, and help to ensure that governments get greater value from their investments.

As important as the assessment is for industry, it is not something that would inspire voters, so it is not something the other parties have been vocal about, although their silence may point to them considering it a good idea and something they could take forward.

The Canadian federal election takes place on 20 September 2021, with results expected soon after.

Guest blogger: John Allen, vice president, Global Public Affairs 

*ICE welcomes guests to share their views about infrastructure policy issues on the Infrastructure Blog. These views are the views of the individual. If you are interested in writing for the Infrastructure Blog, please email [email protected]. ICE reserves the right not to publish articles that have been submitted. 

Top