Road traffic continues to be the world’s biggest killer of young people. Erel Avineri of Tel-Aviv Academic College of Engineering says ending the conflict between vehicles and vulnerable road users is still open to much debate.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the number of annual road traffic deaths on the world's roads reached 1.35 million in 2018. Road traffic injuries are considered to be one of the world's largest injury prevention problems − and the leading killer of young people aged five to 29 years.
Road safety research provides a better understanding of transport infrastructure, vehicles technology and design, and user behaviour, all of which have major effects on the safety performance of transport systems. Unfortunately, the burden of road safety injuries is disproportionately borne by the more vulnerable road users, namely pedestrians and cyclists.
Furthermore, this is largely in conflict with governmental and municipal policy that seek to increase levels of walking and cycling.
Challenging current practice
ICE has therefore just published a themed issue of its Municipal Engineer journal on the topic of road safety and related issues.
The issue opens with a paper by Aldred, exploring the risk posed to pedestrians and cyclists by car drivers on UK urban major roads, compared with urban minor roads. The analysis suggests that re-routing motor traffic to major roads in urban areas may reduce pedestrian causalities.
The next two papers challenge the common practice in design, policy development and evaluation of road safety initiatives.
Employing a methodology based on case studies, Leyendecker's seeks to contribute to the debate about the current practices of road safety in the UK (and possibly elsewhere).
Three case studies are presented which underline the discrepancy between the city's transport policies of favouring walking and cycling over the use of private cars and the way road safety practices are carried out and managed.
Parker provides additional insights perspective on managing the design and delivery of urban highways, with particular emphasis on ‘shared space’ schemes.
Following concepts from behavioural sciences, he makes the argument that, ‘priority and regulation, and routine application of highway engineering standards, may not automatically provide the resulting safe streets that would be expected’.
Two papers from Iran shed light on the behaviour of pedestrians in the urban environment.
Using video recording from intersections, Jahandideh et al investigated individual characteristics (such as age, gender and dressing type) affecting pedestrians’ risk-taking behaviour.
Rassafi and Mohajeri applied cellular automata and discrete choice models to analyse the effects of individual characteristics (such as speed, gender and pedestrian position) and the presence of other pedestrians and obstacles, on the pattern of pedestrian movement.
Lane change is another behaviour highly involved with traffic safety, travel time and functional capacity of motorways. Using data from the USA and Iran, Edrisi and Askari provide a model for predicting the number of lane-changing manoeuvres using a model whose input is the traffic's macroscopic state.
Modelling scheme safety
Finally, to reduce the number of road injuries, there's a need to determine where best to implement road safety schemes and to evaluate their effectiveness.
To help practitioners with these tasks, Matthews et al describe the development of a novel model to inform road safety investment decisions, followed by a description of a software application that implements the model.