A new way for our members to access the huge wealth of knowledge content ICE has. Organised into bite-sized modules.
Our learning is structured around these key areas:
Courses, workshops and membership surgeries to help you achieve professional qualification.
Access videos covering key areas of professional qualification.
Courses, help and advice to advance your career no matter what stage you are at.
Specialist training courses let you learn new skills and add to your personal development.
Earn new qualifications to boost your career and demonstrate your abilities.
Deciding between using a standard form or a bespoke document is quite often a question of culture and business practice. Following the release of the FIDIC yellow book contract guidance publication, author Jakob B. Sørensen discusses the choice between standard and customised contracts.
The above applies not only to legal documents but also when preparing budgets, business plans, and even love letters or Christmas cards. Most standard documents will cover all the relevant topics you need to cover and using a standard document as starting point at least provides you with a checklist of issues to be addressed.
Construction projects frequently end in cost overruns, delays and disputes. Therefore, it's important that the contract you prepare is tailored for the specific project, protects your legitimate interests and stipulates relevant dispute prevention and resolution.
From my experience, it's usually beneficial to start with a generally recognised standard form of contract; FIDIC standard forms of construction contracts are widely used and recognised and so are the NEC standard forms prepared by ICE.
In more specialised areas, other forms will be industry standards, e.g. for offshore UK construction work where the forms prepared by LOGIC are widely used.
If you start with any of the FIDIC contract forms, my companions to the forms will provide you with a guide to draft the contract and they'll also serve as a useful handbook when managing the contract during execution.
Remember, the contract isn't the only important aspect of a project. It could be argued that a carefully and diligently prepared contract is the best way to ensure that the contract supports the project’s requirements and that any disputes are resolved in an appropriate manner.
Although this is, generally speaking, correct, far more important than the choice of contract paradigm or standard is the choice of contractor, the general preparation of the project and the experience of the parties involved.
If the basic design is rubbish, it doesn't matter if the contractor is skilled and the contract is perfect. If the contractor is incompetent, it doesn't matter if the design and the contract are perfect. If the engineer is incompetent, little else matters.
Each contributor to the project should understand and respect the competences and contributions from the other disciplines.
To expand upon this information, Infrastructure professionals are advised to consider which contract is right. Full, comprehensive information is available for review via the ICE bookshop:
Do you have a blog post you want to share with ICE?