Courses, workshops and membership surgeries to help you achieve professional qualification.
24/7 access to recorded webinars covering key areas of professional qualification.
Courses, help and advice to advance your career no matter what stage you are at.
Specialist training courses let you learn new skills and add to your personal development.
Earn new qualifications to boost your career and demonstrate your abilities.
The term sinkhole has appeared more and more in the news in recent months. Since the beginning of the year sinkholes have appeared in St Albans in the UK, Naples in Italy, New York, Mississippi and Florida in USA, throughout China and in Queensland, Australia, among many others.
But what causes sinkholes – and what can civil engineers do about them?
The term sinkhole is usually used to describe a surface depression, hollow or collapse feature occurring above a cavity in the ground formed by the solution of rock by the passage of water over time. There are six main types of sinkhole as classified by Waltham et al. (2005):
Sinkholes can also form above cavities that occur as a result of other processes such as the emptying of liquid lava inside a lava flow (a Thurston Tube), or ice wedging in cold climates, or large-scale movement of rock leaving chasms, known as "guls".
In the UK there has been a long history of mining and water abstraction, which in some areas has left a legacy of man-made cavities. The term sinkhole is, in the UK, often extended to cover the collapse of ground into such man-made features.
Suffosion and dropout sinkholes form entirely within the soil profile above the cavity with infiltrating water washing soil down into open discontinuities in the rockhead. Dissolution, collapse and caprock sinkholes are all dependent on solution and rock mechanics processes that generally occur over geological time related to the solubility and other properties of the country rockmass.
The collapse of ground above cavities and the formation of sinkholes is almost always the result of concentrated flow of water. This might arise as a result of rainfall runoff, the construction of a soakaway, or as a result of fractured water or waste pipes or changes in natural drainage such as drawing down of the water table for major civil or mining works. Tony Waltham, went so far as to title his recent Geological Society Glossop Medal presentation, "Control the Drainage: The Gospel Accorded to Sinkholes".
On rare occasions, cavities have collapsed as a result of the failure of man-made caps, with disastrous consequences. In such cases, it may be found that the cap was simply made by placing railway sleepers over a narrow shaft entrance, which have rotted with time, or masonry which has been buried, forgotten and not maintained.
Sinkholes most commonly occur worldwide within naturally occurring karst landscape that is characterised by the formation of underground drainage and cavities formed by dissolution of soluble rocks such as limestone or gypsum. Civil engineers are best served by seeking advice from geological engineering colleagues familiar with karst geohazards. Clues to the presence of sinkholes may also be found in historical records of mining and old maps.
The first step in high-risk areas is normally to consult the national database of natural and man-made cavities to establish whether known features exist close to a particular site. A general level of the hazard posed by natural features can be established using published methodologies, applying topographic and geological data. Sinkholes and Subsidence: Karst and Cavernous Rocks in Engineering and Construction, by Waltham, Bell and Culshaw, 2005, is an important resource.
In areas of higher risk it is usual to ensure that utilities can tolerate distortion without rupture and to avoid building soakaways or other features that could lead to concentrated water infiltration. Changes in the ground surface, such as depressions, circular cracks or ponding water should be reported to local authorities. In very high risk areas, special ground investigation techniques can be used to refine risk assessments, and if necessary cavities can be located and filled to prevent future collapse.
Boring of tunnels into unknown features or cavities poses a significant risk to both the construction teams and to property overhead. Tunnelling into water filled cavities or where water bodies can flow catastrophically into an excavation are particularly hazardous. Tunnelling works in high risk areas or where abandoned wells or mine shafts might be expected require particular attention during investigation phases, with techniques selected according to the conditions at any given site.
Probabilistic models for predicting sinkhole development have been proposed to inform the management of the risk from this geohazard to major infrastructure projects. The authors recommend caution in the application and reliance on these methods and stress the importance of experience and fully understanding the geological and civil engineering factors that have caused the formation of the sinkholes and related features.
Generally, when the triggering action that has caused the development of a sinkhole (such as flow of water) is removed, the immediate risk to the surrounding area is substantially reduced. It is normal practice to fill smaller holes (those that commonly occur in the UK are typically less than 1000m3 in volume) using weak concrete pumped into the hole from a safe distance. Depending on the circumstances, the sink hole is usually stabilised by concrete or other engineered infill.
Minor settlements occur for several months afterwards as the weight of the concrete settles in. New sinkholes are nearly always formed by inflow of water as noted above and are therefore largely avoided by attention to good civil engineering practices – particularly appropriate surface drainage and avoidance of large scale changes to the water table.
It is essential to investigate the cause of the sinkhole if it is unknown, to understand the lateral and vertical extent of the related cavities and to check the stability remaining cavities were necessary and to monitor changes that are ongoing. The potential complexity of ground conditions that can lead to sinkhole formation must be recognised and specialist advice is required.
Tony Bracegirdle is a senior partner of the Geotechnical Consulting Group. He advises a wide range of clients in dealing with exceptional geotechnical hazard or large loss scenarios both in the UK and abroad. He is currently involved with the investigation of a crown hole collapse in St Albans that occurred on 1 October 2015.
Matthew Free is a director of Arup based in their infrastructure group in London. He leads a team undertaking geohazard and risk management projects at site specific to national scale. He has worked in locations all over the world where karst of different types and sinkholes have been encountered and have required engineering solutions.
Tony and Matt first worked together in the late 1980s in New Zealand, on foundations for a large city development over one of Auckland's many extinct volcanic cones. They both attended Imperial College and later joined UK consultancies. Both are members of the British Geotechnical Association, which provides ICE's knowledge and expertise in the geotechnical sector.