The ICE responds to an inquiry on ending boom and bust in UK rail investment.
This inquiry by the Transport Committee examines how a planned, steady pipeline of projects and investments could benefit rail development in the UK.
The ICE’s response makes the following key points:
- Pipeline uncertainty is reflected in the level of stop/start infrastructure planning and delivery in the UK. This has driven up costs and weakened confidence in the government’s commitment and ability to deliver major infrastructure projects.
- To increase private sector infrastructure investment the UK government should focus on increasing certainty and lowering the risks, costs and time associated with delivering projects.
- The leadership and capability of key supply chains must be nurtured and grown so they can take on the huge infrastructure challenges required to meet wider societal objectives.
- A clear, consistent and detailed project pipeline is a key component of this. The pipeline needs to be stable and set out credible investment opportunities.
- The UK’s strategic infrastructure framework must be joined-up to enable the development of pipelines based on the UK’s wider strategic needs. This framework includes the 10-year national infrastructure strategy, integrated national transport strategy and industrial strategy.
ICE submission to the Transport Committee inquiry on rail investment pipelines
Content type: Policy
Last updated: 17 March 2025
You may also be interested in@headerSize>

- Type
- Infrastructure blog
Can AI help keep major infrastructure projects alive?
The UK’s infrastructure challenge is also a continuity challenge, writes ICE Policy Fellow Dr Samer Ali.

- Type
- Infrastructure blog
Rewiring the State: what does England’s devolution mean for infrastructure?
These reforms would change where decisions are made, who holds influence, and how infrastructure and other investment priorities are determined.

- Type
- Infrastructure blog
HS2's real lesson - was the estimate honest, or just affordable?
The gap between ‘knowing’ and ‘doing’ took eight years to close, writes Dr Alexander Budzier, Fellow at the University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School and CEO at Oxford Global Projects.