The ICE responds to an inquiry on ending boom and bust in UK rail investment.
This inquiry by the Transport Committee examines how a planned, steady pipeline of projects and investments could benefit rail development in the UK.
The ICE’s response makes the following key points:
- Pipeline uncertainty is reflected in the level of stop/start infrastructure planning and delivery in the UK. This has driven up costs and weakened confidence in the government’s commitment and ability to deliver major infrastructure projects.
- To increase private sector infrastructure investment the UK government should focus on increasing certainty and lowering the risks, costs and time associated with delivering projects.
- The leadership and capability of key supply chains must be nurtured and grown so they can take on the huge infrastructure challenges required to meet wider societal objectives.
- A clear, consistent and detailed project pipeline is a key component of this. The pipeline needs to be stable and set out credible investment opportunities.
- The UK’s strategic infrastructure framework must be joined-up to enable the development of pipelines based on the UK’s wider strategic needs. This framework includes the 10-year national infrastructure strategy, integrated national transport strategy and industrial strategy.
ICE submission to the Transport Committee inquiry on rail investment pipelines
Content type: Policy
Last updated: 17 March 2025
You may also be interested in@headerSize>

- Type
- Webinar
Carlingford Lough Greenway
Discover the engineering behind the Carlingford Lough Greenway, a 20km cross-border walking and cycling route linking Newry and Carlingford. Learn how innovative design, stakeholder collaboration and construction planning delivered this landmark active travel scheme.

- Type
- Infrastructure blog
Can AI help keep major infrastructure projects alive?
The UK’s infrastructure challenge is also a continuity challenge, writes ICE Policy Fellow Dr Samer Ali.

- Type
- Infrastructure blog
Rewiring the State: what does England’s devolution mean for infrastructure?
These reforms would change where decisions are made, who holds influence, and how infrastructure and other investment priorities are determined.